Housing fund just one piece of the puzzle – Winnipeg Free Press

opinion

The amount of ink spilled on Canada’s housing crisis is enough to make the global climate crisis feel neglected and envious.

The post-pandemic spike in housing costs in Canada, especially rental prices, has politicians stumbling among themselves to announce their solutions. The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) has determined that to stabilize housing costs by leveling market demand, Canada must add an additional 3.5 million homes (170,000 in Manitoba) to current construction rates by 2030. This figure has been repeated in many Sometimes this has even reduced public discourse about housing affordability to mere housing supply.

This simplification of the issue prevented a more precise discussion such as matching the type of housing with housing needs. Simply oversupplying the market does not address the requirements for social and supportive housing to address homelessness and basic housing needs. It does not create new affordable homes for low-income residents, ignores the specific housing needs of seniors, students, and immigrant families, while ignoring the various challenges of homeownership and renting.



<p>Provided</p>
<p>The new housing development at 197 Osborne Street is an example of creating density in an existing neighborhood.</p>
<p>“/><figcaption class=

supplied

The new housing development at 197 Osborne Street is an example of creating density in an existing neighborhood.

Simply increasing the supply of housing does not take into account where housing is being built. Over the past 50 years, cities have grown primarily through suburban sprawl, resulting in an urban form that is economically and environmentally unsustainable. If we are to build enough housing to eliminate the housing crisis, while also creating livable, equitable, and financially prosperous cities, new construction can no longer rely solely on sprawling subdivisions and downtown residential towers. Growth and densification must occur in all neighborhoods of the city. Most people want to be part of a community, and live on a residential street, close to amenities such as schools, shopping, transit, community centers, and parks. Socially just growth means providing affordable access to existing neighborhoods for new residents. Achieving this goal would require ending exclusionary zoning and allowing the construction of basement and garden suites, duplexes, four-story townhomes, townhomes, and even small apartment complexes on residential streets.

A sound political point that has gained more attention is the need to “remove gatekeepers” who stand in the way of housing construction. These gatekeepers are largely portrayed as civic politicians, bureaucrats and planning departments who slow down development approvals. However, the real gatekeepers are local residents who continually oppose change and densification in their neighborhoods. City governments are directly accountable to their constituents, so that local priorities are inevitably reflected in the decision-making process, with larger goals often getting lost in the process.

Zoning and neighborhood plans can reflect this public desire to resist change, even when the long-term benefits are well understood. If residents support new development projects more readily, local governments will reflect these priorities, and the floodgates of approval will open.

Recognizing the need for a cultural change in how city governments respond to local concerns, the federal government implemented a new $4 billion program called the Housing Acceleration Fund. The program goes beyond simply increasing supply and responds to the nuances of Canada’s housing needs, by incentivizing local governments to remove barriers to housing development and create a diverse, affordable and equitable housing supply.